In a groundbreaking legal resolution that may reshape financial aid practices in higher education, 17 top U.S. universities have agreed to a combined $284 million settlement. This class action settlement addresses allegations that these prestigious institutions engaged in anticompetitive conduct, violating federal antitrust laws and ultimately burdening thousands of students with higher education costs.
The lawsuit accused universities of participating in an information-sharing alliance under the umbrella of the 568 Presidents Group, which allegedly enabled them to coordinate financial aid policies. This coordination, the plaintiffs argue, suppressed competition and allowed schools to reduce aid awards, thereby inflating the net costs borne by students. Although the universities deny any wrongdoing, they have chosen to settle the case to avoid prolonged litigation.
The class action primarily benefits undergraduate students who received need-based financial aid between 2003 and 2024, but whose aid packages failed to fully cover tuition, room, board, or fees. Importantly, students who received full financial coverage are not eligible for compensation under the settlement.
Universities Involved and Class Periods Defined
Eligibility depends heavily on the university attended and the specific years of enrollment. Each institution’s involvement in the alleged conduct varied by time, as outlined in the lawsuit.
| University | Class Period |
|---|---|
| Duke, Penn, Yale, MIT, etc. | Fall 2003 – Feb 28, 2024 |
| Brown, Dartmouth, Emory | Fall 2004 – Feb 28, 2024 |
| CalTech | Fall 2019 – Feb 28, 2024 |
| Johns Hopkins University | Fall 2021 – Feb 28, 2024 |
Most students eligible under this settlement were enrolled during these specific class periods, and records will be used to verify claims. Students from institutions with later class periods, such as CalTech and Johns Hopkins, will also be included based on similar financial aid practices.
The Allegations Explained: What the Lawsuit Claimed
The lawsuit targeted the use of a common methodology to calculate financial need, which was shared across institutions under the 568 Presidents Group. While these practices were technically permitted under antitrust exemptions, they were contingent on all members offering need-blind admissions—a standard that plaintiffs say many did not uphold.
According to the complaint, the group’s existence allowed universities to limit financial aid offerings artificially, and standardize aid calculations in a way that stifled competition. Students who might have received larger financial aid packages under an open, competitive system were allegedly shortchanged.
This practice had ripple effects. By reducing financial assistance across the board, universities ensured that students were paying more out-of-pocket costs than they should have. The practice is said to have particularly harmed low- and middle-income students.
Eligibility Criteria for Claimants
To qualify for a payment under this class action settlement, claimants must satisfy specific eligibility criteria. The goal is to ensure that only those genuinely affected by the alleged conduct receive compensation.
Who Is Eligible?
- Undergraduate students enrolled full-time at any of the 17 named universities
- Students who received some form of need-based financial aid
- Students who paid any portion of tuition, room, board, or fees themselves
- Enrolled during the applicable class period for the university
However, not everyone is covered under this settlement.
Who Is NOT Eligible?
- Students who received full financial aid covering all expenses
- Graduate or professional students (law, medicine, MBA, etc.)
- Those enrolled outside the defined class periods
- Students who didn’t apply for or weren’t granted need-based aid
Students falling within the covered categories should gather their tuition and aid documents to verify if they qualify once the claim process opens.
How Will the $284 Million Be Shared?
The final payout each class member will receive is not fixed but depends on several financial factors. Payments will be distributed pro rata, meaning funds will be divided proportionally among eligible claimants based on individual circumstances.
| Determining Factor | Impact on Payout |
|---|---|
| Total Years Enrolled in Class Period | More years = Higher payout |
| Out-of-Pocket Educational Expenses | Higher costs = Larger compensation |
| Number of Valid Claims Received | More claims = Smaller per-person share |
The exact amount per student will be known only after all claims are reviewed and approved. Students who attended for longer durations or paid more out-of-pocket are expected to receive larger payments.
How to File a Claim: Step-by-Step Process
While the settlement was approved at the June 20, 2025 final hearing, claim submissions are pending the court’s official green light for the claims process. Once the process begins, claimants will have multiple options to submit their claim forms.
Claim forms will be accessible online, via email, and through postal mail. For those whose contact information is already available, a claim form will be automatically mailed to them.
Here’s how students can file their claim:
- Visit the official settlement website (once available)
- Download or fill out the claim form online
- Submit the form electronically, via email, or through mail
- Call 1-833-585-3338 to request a paper form, if necessary
- Track submission and await communication from the claims administrator
The deadline for exclusion or objection is April 9, 2025, after which no changes or withdrawals will be allowed.
Broader Implications for University Aid Transparency
Beyond the financial payout, this case marks a shift in how universities might be expected to operate their financial aid offices moving forward. Although the settlement does not impose formal sanctions or reforms, it exposes the legal vulnerability of institutional collaboration in tuition pricing.
The case has sparked debates about whether elite institutions should continue operating under shared financial policies, especially if those policies restrict access for low-income students. Critics argue that the alleged conduct eroded the trust students and families place in fair aid assessments.
This case may also embolden future lawsuits if universities are seen engaging in similar cooperative practices without full adherence to legal conditions.
A Step Toward Justice and Financial Relief
The $284 million financial aid class action settlement is more than a legal formality—it represents recognition that the cost of higher education was potentially inflated through coordinated behavior. For students who sacrificed financially to attend elite institutions, this settlement brings a chance at partial reimbursement and, hopefully, institutional introspection.
Eligible students should monitor the claims process and prepare documentation in advance. For many, this settlement is not just about the money—it’s about accountability and equity in American education.
Would you like a featured image for this article with a realistic classroom or university campus background and the title text “University Financial Aid Settlement – $284M Payout Begins”?